Larger Thought Unit
This unit extends over Mark 8:22-10:52. This can be seen in the opening story of the healing of the blind man beginning in 8:22 and ending with the healing of the blind Bartimaeus in 10:46-52. Also in this section are the three predictions of Christ in which he teaches his disciples about his passion and crucifixion. The central issues are the blindness of the disciples to the teaching of Jesus, on the one hand, and the gospel of the cross (1 Cor 1:18), on the other hand. It is significant that the introduction to today’s reading is the rebuke of Peter who, blinded by his own misunderstanding, forces Christ to rebuke him with the harshest of words: ‘Satan.’ The key ultimately is to let Christ heal us by faith and for us then to follow him ‘on the way,’ as Bartimaeus will do at the end of the unit.
Notes
This passage follows immediately Jesus’ harsh rebuke to Peter who was addressed as ‘Satan’ (8:33), Peter did not understand that the true gospel is the one he, Peter, agreed upon at the Jerusalem meeting (Gal 2:1-10) and then reneged upon at Antioch (Gal 2:11-14). The true gospel (see ‘the truth of the gospel’ in Gal 2.5, 14) was preached all along by Paul, who refers to it as “the word, namely the word that carries the meaning of the cross” (Ὁ λόγος γὰρ ὁ τοῦ σταυροῦ /; 1 Cor 1:18), i.e., the gospel that presents God’s messiah as “cursed by God” (Gal 3:13). As such this messiah becomes “a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles, but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God” (1 Cor 1:23-24). The link to ‘the gospel’ is made clear by Mark who, among all the evangelists, has the additional “(for) the gospel’s (sake)” after “for my sake” (Mk 8:35; compare with Mt 16.25; Lk 9.24). That the present pericope continues its criticism of Peter and his like can be detected in that the verb ‘deny (ἀπαρνησάσθω),’ used here in Mk 8:34, occurs later three more times in Mark, all being in reference to Peter’s denial of Jesus (14:30, 31, 72).
Further indications that Peter is being judged here in the light of ‘the gospel,’ which is none other the gospel preached by Paul (see ‘my gospel’ in Rom 2:16; 16:25; 2 Tim 2:8 and ‘our gospel’ in 2 Cor 4:3; 1 Thess 1:5; 2 Thess 2:14) are the following:
- The opposite pair ‘gain’ (κερδήσῃ) and ‘forfeit’ (ζημιωθῇ) is found in Phil3:7-8
- The opposition between ‘save’ (σῶσαι from the root σῶ/-- as σωτηρια [salvation]) and ‘lose/destroy’ (ἀπολέσει from the same root as απωλεια [destruction]); see Phil 1:28;
- The reference to the ‘shame’ related to the gospel (Rom 1:16; 2 Tim 1:8) or the cross (1 Cor 1:23-27 ); see also the ‘boasting’ (the opposite of shame) related to the gospel (2 Cor 10:16-17; Phil 2:14-16) or the cross (Gal 6:14)
An interesting passage is Phil 3:18-20: “For many, of whom I have often told you and now tell you even with tears, live as enemies of the cross of Christ. Their end is destruction, their god is the belly, and they glory in their shame, with minds set on earthly things. But our commonwealth is in heaven, and from it we await a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ…”
Further resource
Sharyn Dowd, Reading Mark, Smith & Helwys Publishers, Macon GA, 2000.
Paul Nadim Tarazi, New Testament Introduction, Vol.1: Paul and Mark, St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, Crestwood, NY, 1999; pp.187-90.
Paul Nadim Tarazi, New
Testament Introduction, Vol.2: Luke and Acts, St Vladimir’s Seminary
Press, Crestwood, NY, 2001; p.72.